Talk:Ontario Highway 91
Ontario Highway 91 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 14, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 91/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 03:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Floydian τ ¢
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 03:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: .
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Done
|
Done
|
Check for WP:WTW: None
Check for WP:EMBED: Done
- The table is standard in such articles. Checked other FAs - Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: very good Checked other FAs - Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416
Done
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
- c. No original research: Done
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
Not all sources are accessible. Cross-checked with other FAs - Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416. Random check on accessible sources - Source 2,4,5
|
b. Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, the issues are:
Fix short paragraph.
This article is a very promising GA nominee. I'm delighted to see your work here. I'm putting the article on hold. All the best! --Seabuckthorn ♥ 04:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- I've puffed the text where I can. This is one of those routes that was boring and short, so it's hard to find much to add. Cheers, Floydian τ ¢ 23:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:41, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- GA-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- GA-Class Ontario articles
- Low-importance Ontario articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- GA-Class Canada road transport articles
- Low-importance Canada road transport articles
- GA-Class Ontario road transport articles
- Low-importance Ontario road transport articles
- Ontario road transport articles
- Ontario road transport articles with KML
- GA-Class Road transport articles
- Low-importance Road transport articles
- Canada Roads project articles without needs-map