Talk:Ontario Highway 58

Ontario Highway 58 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 13, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Canada Roads: Ontario Mid‑importance

This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Ontario

This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly.

This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, add |needs-kml=no to the Canada Roads banner.

Orphaned references in Ontario Highway 58

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Ontario Highway 58's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "gmaps":

From Ontario Highway 417: "Highway 417 length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved January 21, 2012.
From Northern Ontario Resource Trail: "Northern Ontario Resource Trail - length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved January 16, 2014.
From Ontario Highway 51: "Highway 51 route and length" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved August 27, 2011.
From Ontario Highway 407: "Highway 407 - Length and Route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved July 19, 2014.
From Ontario Highway 19: "Highway 19 - length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved February 23, 2014.
From Ontario Highway 92: "Highway 92 - length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved March 9, 2014.
From Ontario Highway 427: "Highway 427 length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved November 7, 2011.
From Ontario Highway 90: "Highway 90 length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved September 7, 2014.
From Ontario Highway 88: "Highway 88 - length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved January 15, 2014.
From Ontario Highway 41: "Highway 41 - Length and Route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved January 9, 2012.
From Ontario Highway 53: "Highway 53 length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved February 3, 2012.
From Hanlon Expressway: "Hanlon Expressway – Length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved December 14, 2013.
From Ontario Highway 420: "Highway 420 length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved January 30, 2012.
From Ontario Highway 6: "Highway 6 - length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved January 23, 2014.
From Ontario Highway 14: "Highway 14 - length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved January 16, 2013.
From Ontario Highway 136: "Highway 136 length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
From Ontario Highway 39: "Highway 39 - approximate length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved February 21, 2014.
From Ontario Highway 23: "Highway 23 - Length and route" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved January 9, 2012.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 58/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 22:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

"The southern segment travels from Niagara Regional Road 3, formerly Highway 3, in Port Colborne, to the Highway 58A junction in the southern end of Welland, a distance of 7.2 km (4.5 mi); the northern segment begins at Highway 20 near Allanburg and travels north and west to a large junction with Highway 406 at the St. Catharines – Thorold boundary, a distance of 8.3 km (5.2 mi). " -too long. New sentence before the northern segment is fine.

Fixed - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't "travelled" a British English spelling?

Not sure if Canadian English uses two or one, but I've always used two l's in my writing and never had it contested before. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Description

"the route passes beneath a railway" -can you be more specific on the railway?

Done. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Downloading

"Budget constraints brought on by a recession in the 1990s resulted in the Mike Harris provincial government forming the Who Does What? committee to" -when was this?

Specified the year. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Table

Do you intend clearing those red links in the table?

Done. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I don't believe I received a notice that the GAN had begun. I've made fixes as noted above. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Making sure you've seen this. --Rs chen 7754 18:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the ping didn't work! I did check in on this for a few weeks but left it when it seemed the writer wasn't coming back! Thanks for addressing!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]