Talk:Ontario Health Insurance Plan

Canada: Ontario Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Alphabet soup: OHIP, OHSIP and OMSIP

Previous names of the provincial government plan were OMSIP and OHSIP. OHSIP was later shortened to the present OHIP.

I remember, as a child, hearing the radio advertising in the late 1960s, over and over for weeks, about the changeover from OMSIP to OHSIP. I have no memory, however, of the change from OHSIP, but that must have been in the 1970s or early 1980s.

OMSIP (Ontario Medical Services Insurance Plan) was established and enacted on July 1, 1966. On October 1, 1969, the Ontario Health Services Insurance Plan began as a provincially run and federally assisted (under the federal Medical Care Insurance Act for establishment of a national medicare plan). GBC 17:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the footnote to the official history "Official website history" is a broken link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tetsuo (talk • contribs) 23:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC) Tetsuo (talk) 23:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quebec's End of Coverage

In this sentence, please note the bold part: "For those Canadian citizens or permanent residents moving to Ontario from another province, the province of previous residency will continue to cover them during the three month waiting period (except Quebec, where coverage only lasts two months after leaving)."

That sentence is not correct. Quebec's coverage ends on the last day of the second month since one leaves the province. Please see: http://www.ramq.gouv.qc.ca/fr/citoyens/assurancemaladie/quitter/exterieur.shtml. Therefore, I removed the phrase in the bracket. 70.53.195.14 (talk) 20:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I attempted to click on the Quebec link, I received the following message:

Impossible de trouver la page La page que vous voulez visualiser est introuvable. Il est possible qu'elle ne soit pas disponible pour le moment ou qu'elle ait été déplacée ou supprimée.

Vous pouvez vous rendre à la page d'accueil et rechercher l'information désirée à l'aide de notre outil de recherche, ou encore consulter le plan du site.

Merci de votre visite!

Two points: (1) the link is dead, and it needs to be corrected; (2) links inserted into an English-language encyclopedia should direct the reader to a source written in the English language. Links to French-language sources should be used only in the French-language edition of Wikipedia.

John Paul Parks (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was NO CONSENSUS to move page to OHIP, per discussion below. Our general rules of avoiding abbreviations on one hand, and using common names on the other hand, come into conflict here. In this case, there seems to be strong support for sticking with the former of the two, as OHIP is not sufficiently well-known outside of Ontario. -GTBacchus^(talk) 02:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario Health Insurance Plan → OHIP — This is the name that it is most commonly known, and WP:NAME convention is to use the most common name. —GreenJoe 03:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Oppose. WP:NAME: "Avoid the use of abbreviations, including acronyms, in page naming unless the term you are naming is almost exclusively known only by its abbreviation and is widely known and used in that form. NATO, NASA, laser, radar, and scuba are good examples of acronyms that are commonly thought of as words." I would say that OHIP is most widely known in Ontario by the acronym but not as much outside of its borders. The full name is also preferable given that there are other OHIPs that could be encyclopedic articles. In health care alone: Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), Georgia's Office of Health Information and Policy (OHIP), OHIP - Open Health Information Project .... Canuckle 04:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, there is no reason not to simply state the full name of the subject of an article in its title. Paul 11:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I respectfully disagree with the opinions put forth by Canuckle and Paul. The Plan is "almost exclusively known only by its abbreviation and is widely known and used in that form". Whether there are other OHIPs in the world is irrelevant to the first step of the analysis -- the mere existence of other uses of the acronym does not automatically render it unusable as a title (NASA also stands for National Auto Sport Association, to name one example, but we still use it as the title for the article on the space agency). The second step is to determine if the Ontario plan is the primary use of the name. My Google search indicates that it is. Every page of search overwhelmingly refers to the Ontario plan, with a scattering of other uses (none of them showing up with any real regularity in the search results). Unlike GreenJoe, I did get one non-Ontario result on my first search page though (an internship program in California). I also note, that unlike the NASA example, we don't have any Wikipedia articles on the other uses of OHIP, and OHIP has always been a redirect to the article on the Ontario plan. As for Paul's position, there is a reason not to state the full name in the title -- we should be using the name by which the plan is most commonly known.
I support the move, therefore, on the basis that it is easily the most commonly-used name for the subject, it is the dominant use of the acronym, and the existence of any other OHIPs can be addressed through the simple use of a DAB statement at the top of the page. This is a no-brainer. Skeezix1000 15:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my comments below. GreenJoe 17:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It is not WP:NAME convention to use the most common name, it is to avoid abbreviations except if almost exclusively known by the abbreviation. I agree that, in Ontario, OHIP is the common way to refer to it but believe it is far better to have the encyclopedic entry as its full and proper name with OHIP as a redirect, as it stands now. DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:NAME. JPG-GR 21:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, avoid abreviations OHIP redirects there now. When I lived in Manitoba nobody knew what and OHIP stood for--Kelapstick 15:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

When I search Google, the Ontario OHIP is the entire first page of search results. GreenJoe 04:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which is not definitive. However, I'd support the continued redirect from OHIP to Ontario Health Insurance Plan over a redirect to OHIP (disambiguation). Canuckle 15:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it should be a continued redirect, as there do not appear to be any other OHIP articles. I understand that Google is not definitive, but absent any other evidence, it is pretty good evidence that the Ontario plan is the dominant use of the name. Skeezix1000 16:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Opt-out provisions

The article could be expanded by discussing past and current provisions for opting out: Although very few medical providers or eligible Ontario residents choose to opt-out of OHIP, it might be worth noting any exceptions to mandatory participation. For example, do doctors have the option to bill patients rather than billing OHIP, letting the patients seek reimbursement from OHIP? Also, what if an eligible resident neglects to enroll or chooses not to enroll in OHIP, possibly because he/she is a libertarian opposed to government involvement in health insurance, or because he/she has a communication or mental impairment and is unaware of the program or otherwise incapable of completing the necessary forms? Also, are some groups, e.g. Mennonites, exempt due to their religious beliefs? Tetsuo (talk) 04:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Physicians in Ontario are allowed to opt out but price controls forbid them from charging more than the OHIP price schedule. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.233.20.164 (talk) 23:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listed care

We currently have a 'delisted care' section for procedures that were once covered but are no longer.

Shouldn't we have a 'listed' section for procedures which are currently covered?

For example, vasectomies? Ranze (talk) 03:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

funding :

this article says the program is funded by payroll taxes. That's not quite accurate. It's funded out of all the taxes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.233.20.164 (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be good to know how much comes from each area, personal income taxes (by income range), employer contributions, income tax surcharges for each income range, transfer payments. 96.63.53.152 (talk) 14:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]