Talk:Dating app

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dating app article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Websites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Websites.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Apps Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

On 2 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Online dating application to Dating app. The result of the discussion was moved.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Smasseroli.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer reviews

Hello! Below is my peer review:

What does the article (or section) do well?

I think you have picked an interesting topic and have found good data on it that shows how trends have changed. I really liked the "effects on data" and "pros and cons" section and felt that this added great deal to the article. I also liked the section that described tinder because I feel like it provides some insight on how new dating apps work for someone who may not be familiar with them.

What changes would you suggest overall?

I believe you are writing a new page since I couldn’t find a Wikipedia article specifically about online dating applications. However, there is a page for online dating service. After looking at your “User by Demographic Group” section I would just be wary of overlap or possibly make this article a subsection of that page. I suggest this because in this section you use data from years before the smartphone and apps really existed (original iphone released in 2007). Instead of doing that you could possibly just make it clear that data in 2016 probably includes apps and dating website (unless it specifies only apps) while data from before 2007 probably didn’t include any apps and was mainly dating websites.

A similar issue seems to come up in the “other popular applications” and “effects on dating” section as well. It may be useful to mention some are dating websites that have made a mobile app for convenience while others were developed as mobile apps.

I might also put the “how dating apps started” section before “user by demographic” section since this seems more like the history of it, which I would expect to find first.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution?

There are small language errors or missing words that can be a little distracting. I would try to just clean up the article just a bit. Just as an example, in your “Other popular applications” sections you say “the research results indicated that only 11 apps scored 50 or greater” but do not say out of what rating possible. Another small thing in the same section is it says “conducted a research” instead of conducted a research study. I don’t mean to pick on specifics, but just wanted to give examples of things that I found distracting while reading.

Did you learn anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know!

My subject was on corporate governance so the information isn’t really applicable to my topic. I did learn some new things about dating apps, which ones are popular, and rates of usage though!

Hi, this is James from your Advanced Writing class and here are my thoughts:

What does the article (or section) do well?

I think Sofia picked a relevant and fun topic that I would love to learn more about. I liked the pros and cons section and it added more of a personal level to the article. The article was written with no bias and it was very informative in teaching me more about online dating.

What changes would you suggest overall? I think the title names of each section can be changed. "How Dating Apps Started" can be changed to something more simple like "History" or something of that nature, and "Usage of Demographic Group" can be shortened to "Demographics".

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? I think maybe a bit more detail under the other dating apps besides Tinder. I understand Tinder is the biggest dating app out there right now, but it may be nice to have a little description for each of the bigger dating apps to get the readers a better feel of the apps.

Did you learn anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! I learned how many different subtopics of Online Dating there could be, and to be more open and creative with my topic.

Poor objectivity

Why does this page read like an ad for Tinder? I get that Tinder was one of the first dating apps but the whole article reeks of PR. 32.213.191.91 (talk) 05:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC) snail[reply]

Requested move 2 April 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 04:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Online dating application → Dating app – WP:CONCISE and WP:COMMONNAME, see for example Hinge (app) or Tinder (app). I know it was brought up at the previous discussion at Talk:Online dating that there is some overlap between this article and that one, as well as Mobile dating, but whether it should be merged would be better off as a separate discussion. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC) Notifying participants of previous discussion. @Festucalex, BarrelProof, Colin M, and Zxcvbnm: - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. This is how they are referred to. No need for the extra verbiage and syllables that sound like they are from 1980. Softlavender (talk) 06:34, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Incredibly clear common name vs name that absolutely nobody ever uses. No contest per WP:COMMONNAME. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per everyone else. Seems like an obvious move. DFlhb (talk) 19:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.