Talk:Onesies (brand)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands

Fashion

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion

POV

This article is incredibly POV. It reads like a defense of Gerber's right to the patented name "Onesie" instead of an overview of a brand of jumpsuits. A good example of what to follow would be our Kleenex article. Brand identity, uniqueness, and history are what we are shooting for. Not a forceful assertion that not all jumpsuits are official "Onesies". I realize Gerber's lawyers are hyper aggressive on this enforcement and may have overseen the writing of this article, but Wikipedia doesn't work this way. Them From Space 07:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am inclined to agree. How do you think it should be made better? I remove some information which is more about legal questions than about the brand as such. There isn't even a word about the design or history of the Onesies infant bodysuit range here! Cecil Huber (talk) 21:41, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

I redirected the page to infant bodysuit now, because the only substatial information in the article was the fact that "Onesies" is a registered trademark (but it wasn't even clear about who owns it). The article has looked the same, like a mess, for some years now, and this fact about the trademark protection is already mentioned in the article it is now redirected to. Snowsuit Wearer (talk|contribs) 19:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]