Talk:One person, one vote
Appearance
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • One man, one vote Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:One man, one vote |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Separation from One man, one vote
[edit]As per discussion on Talk:One man, one vote on Requested move 22 May 2022, there is a significant difference between One man, one vote and One person, one vote. For example, plenty legal documents refer to one person, one vote. That means I think it should not be just redirected from One person, one vote to One man, one vote, but One person, one vote deserves a separate article. HudecEmil (talk) 02:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Closed, full Discussion on Talk:One man, one vote HudecEmil (talk) 20:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Copied from One man, one vote
[edit]Significant part of the current text is copied from https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=One_man,_one_vote&oldid=1091867291 HudecEmil (talk) 20:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)