Talk:One from the Heart

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Untitled

I'm surprised that this movie doesn't have an article yet, considering it's from such a major director, and is, from what I gather, one of his more important movies, behind a handful of rather obvious ones. I haven't actually seen the film before, so I don't know how much more I can contribute. Thebogusman 23:03, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Teri Garr Image

Not that TG ca 1982 isn't pleasant to look at, but the need for seeing her nude photo to illustrate "cast" just doesn't rise to the "fair use" criterion of "critical comment or illustration." DavidOaks (talk) 21:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 00:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting that this article be moved back to the plain title, because the film is clearly the primary use. The film article was recently moved to One from the Heart (film), and One from the Heart was made into a disambiguation page. But there are only two articles to disambiguate: this one and the article for One from the Heart (album), the soundtrack album (there was a duplicate soundtrack article, One from the Heart (Soundtrack), which I have redirected to the (album) article). The page One from the Heart has about 70 incoming links (the editor who moved the film page didn't fix the links), nearly all of which refer to the film. The film article should be returned to its original location.--ShelfSkewed Talk 19:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~. All Films articles are titled like that. A M M A R 19:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: That is simply untrue. Just off the top of my head: The Graduate, The Godfather, Schindler's List, The Lion King...there's a virtually endless list of films located at the plain (no clarifier) article title despite there being other uses for the title, because the film is, as in this case, the primary use of the title.--ShelfSkewed Talk 20:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In this case i Support. A M M A R 06:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator, per primary use, and per lack of disambiguation required -- just use an "otheruses" link at the top of the page. Llamasharmafarmerdrama (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.