Talk:Olympic National Park

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas High‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as High-importance).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Dunagan, Christopher (April 13, 2015). "At 75, Olympic National Park has grown amid push-pull of forces". Kitsap Sun. Retrieved November 25, 2021.

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

Olympic Wilderness vs Peninsula

The Intro ends with the sentence, "In 1988, almost all of the Olympic Peninsula was designated as the Olympic Wilderness ...". "Olympic Wilderness" is a stub-entry, and identifies it as "... comprising over 95% of Olympic National Park".

Nearly all the low-land forest biome of the Olympic Peninsula was converted to commercial plantation forest in the early 20th C., and most of that continues to be logged, heavily. There has been some reclassification of National Forest areas, and extensive 'spotted owl closure', but Washington DNR state forest and corporate timberlands are in active extraction. A rough guess is that about half the Olympic Peninsula is Olympic National Park (and Olympic Wilderness), while the other half is full-on logging-country.

Originally (1890s) the environmentalist aspiration was to protect the whole of the Olympic Peninsula, as an integrated, complete habitat. However, the Olympic Nat'l Park was stalled for 40 years (while the valuable - and stunning - lowland forests were 'converted'), and then only the mountainous interior zone (and its low-value timber) was made Park. Nonetheless, talk & hope persisted, that the entirety of the Peninsula could be protected ... and hold-overs of this idea continue to appear in contemporary literature.

Most likely a minor 'typo', the statement that "almost all of the Olympic Peninsula" is Wilderness also alludes to a substantial backstory & not-yet-dead meme ... in which that is what would have happened. Ted Clayton (talk) 01:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flora

The Olympics have some really amazing flora. I'd really be cool to have a section about it, not only the flora but maybe also about the other beauty it shares.

Geology

From my last visit to Olympic National Park, it sounded like it had a very unique geology. I really don't know enough to write anything about it, but I think it should be mentioned.65.100.48.231 18:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images and Diagrams

An archival photo of the beach (or rivers) showing log-jams would be useful.

A map of the park area showing how the coastal strip is separate from the mountainous area would be more informative than our description. (Also a reference for Roosevelt's involvement in the Park's creation is necessary.) K Krum 08:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC) they had alot of butts..[reply]

Duplication

Without omitting the comparative difficulty of the beach sections, much of the Coastline paragraphs should be moved to Recreation, or trimmed where duplicate. K Krum 08:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Created

Many people want to know why the park was made in the first place or even why congress had denied aprovel in the first place. Some words from the legislation itself, could help many more people understand and grasp the concept of why President Theodore Roosevelt created it in the first place, or why Franklin Roosevelt approved it. This information could help us understand exactly why this beautiful park is here today.

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC) your adopted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.211.215.58 (talk) 21:55, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Partly fixed "Wilderness" thing

As somebody pointed out above, the article recently said most of Olympic Pen. was designated wilderness in 1988, which of course is incorrect. I'm assuming there was some 1988 legislation affecting some federal properties. Perhaps I even dimly aware of this, but have no citations. There were some small wilderness areas created in mid-to-late 1970s, but probably whatever the latest legislative action would be in this regard is sufficient to note.

Citations would be helpful.

Calamitybrook (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is cited

Only the intro has citations. The rest of it doesn't. Where are the other citations for everything in this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.252.183.253 (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Please feel free to help out and add some, I'm going to remove the B-class rating, as that's obviously wrong for an unreferenced article. Acroterion (talk) 21:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Olympic National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nps.gov/legal/Proclamations_and_Orders/Proclamations_and_Orders_Vol_II/17_Appendix_III.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140310033247/http://www.accesstheridge.org/petition/ to http://www.accesstheridge.org/petition/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]