Jump to content

Talk:Olympic-class ocean liner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

The image Image:RMS Olympic.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with a free image. Maralia (talk) 03:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment

[edit]

I have reverted this article's assessment as B. It fails B2 by not providing sections for Titanic and Britannic like has been done for Olympic. This is a glaring hole in the article and the article will not be B until that is done. -MBK004 00:28, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a section for the Britannic --Champion1701 (talk) 04:40, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Largest shipwreck in the world?

[edit]

The wreck of Britannic is described as the largest shipwreck in the world. Any source or clarification for this? Is it the largest passenger ship wreck? Bigger cargo ships, such as MV Kowloon Bridge and MT Haven, have been lost over the years. Tupsumato (talk) 10:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While your edit is I believe technically accurate, we do need to do a little research to qualify what measure is being used for "largest". The two examples you mentioned had larger displacement, and their tonnage is listed in deadweight, not gross tonnage (which is a measure of enclosed space, not weight). A quick look at the dimensions of the two ships you mentioned would indicate that they are likely of a much smaller gross tonnage than Britannic. I would hypothesize, without having done any hard research, that the "largest" claim refers to gross tonnage. But we'll have to see, I suppose. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Both MV Kowloon Bridge and MT Haven were very large ships and while I couldn't find their gross tonnages with a quick search, even smaller ships of the same type have greater gross tonnage than HMHS Britannic. One such example is MT Tempera which has a gross tonnage of 64,259 GT, more than that of the old liner. Therefore I would assume that both of the ships I mentioned have a greater gross tonnage than the Britannic, meaning that it's at most the biggest passenger ship wreck in the world. Tupsumato (talk) 16:39, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to include the size to the deck description, I would suggest "one of the largest wrecks in the world" or "one of the largest passenger ship wrecks in the world" until someone verifies that no bigger passenger ships have sunk since Britannic (which I believe is the case after a quick lookup). Tupsumato (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There were larger liner wrecks than Britannic, e.g. SS Rex, SS Normandie, and RMS Queen Elizabeth. But these liners did not really sink and were scrapped later on, although of the Rex some remaining parts are left. So Britannic seems to be the largest passenger ship wreck. Unfortunately I've actually no source at hand, but I'm sure that I've read this several times.--DFoerster (talk) 17:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
While we figure this out, I'm removing the passage, which is a bit more disputed than I thought, until we get this all straightened out. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:34, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artists impression of the D Deck Reception room on the RMS Britannic (HMHS Britannic).jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Artists impression of the D Deck Reception room on the RMS Britannic (HMHS Britannic).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

4 Planned Olympic Liners?

[edit]

On TGOL's website there was a mentioning of 4 Olympic Class Oceanic Liners with the 4th one to be called Homeric. Planning of the ship however stopped after the outbreak of WWI. Should it be mentioned in this article somewhere? However I will change the numbers of planned Olympic Liners to 4 since there is evidence to warrant it.--Trulystand700 (talk) 02:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link: http://www.thegreatoceanliners.com/index2.html

hi

[edit]

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.29.216 (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Olympic-class ocean liner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 09:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:55, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: College Composition II

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 11 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ChrisNew4 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Lindseybean28 (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Olympic-class_ocean_liner&oldid=1235951982"