Talk:Olmedilla Photovoltaic Park

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Olmedilla Photovoltaic Park article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spain High‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Olmedilla Photovoltaic Park be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Spain may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

World second largest?

The articles states that Olmedilla is the world's second largest photovoltaic plant. However, by my understandings it the fourth largest after Finsterwalde, Sarnia and Rovigo plants. Also, sentence "It produces enough electricity to power more than 40,000 homes." is a good marketing argument but more encyclopedic would be annual generation. Beagel (talk) 22:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think someone with little knowledge of how fast things are changing with PV power plants has been making some statements about size in various articles which have dated very quickly. I will try to fix those mistakes that I see.

On your other point, I think first and foremost we should impartially present information that is given in reliable sources. If number of homes is given, use that. If annual generation is given use that. If both are given, use both. That is the encyclopedic way to do things. Johnfos (talk) 23:57, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This source by Vaclav Smil says for average annual generation 85 GWh and for capacity factor 16%. Although there may be question if the website as such is reliable, Vaclav Smil is definitely is reliable author. The problem with the number of homes is that this is not a constant figure: it changes over the time and varies from country to country depending standard of living, measures implemented for the energy savings, and not least, climate. Therefore, the number of homes is definitely interesting, but it is not encyclopedic. Beagel (talk) 09:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is our job to report what the reliable sources say, irrespective of whether we agree with it or not. That is NPOV. That is being encyclopedic. Johnfos (talk) 21:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]