Talk:Olivia Savvas

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Australia: Adelaide / Politics Low‑importance

Olivia Savvas is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2022)

This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

Hi Peacemaker67, could you please tell me what your concern is with my edit? Thank you CountryLad (talk) 05:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Your edit summary said "Rewrote introduction to be more concise and focus on the things that make Savvas notable. Existing introduction refers to many unnotable things such as that she grew up in NE Adelaide. Personal life section slightly restructured to make more logical and readable. Career section edited to remove repetition of what has already been said". For starters, a lead or introduction is supposed to be a summary of the main points of the article, not just about why a person is notable. That is established in the first sentence. She is a state politician and that is why she is notable. How she became one is an important part of the article, and should be in the lead. The fact that she grew up where she is now the MP is highly relevant context, many politicians are not from the area they now represent. That is also why the result of the election is there, context. The context of her win is provided by the statement of Green, that the seat generally follows the winner of the state election. Basic details of her background are also relevant to the lead, and that is why the second para is there. You also removed her full name from the first sentence of the Personal life and career section. Everything in an article needs to be in the body, the lead is just a summary of what follows. Her full name is sourced to the ABC. The detail of Green's statement about the seat trend needs to be in the body because it is not sourced in the lead, and the lead is just a summary of the body, as I've already stated. The same goes for the bit about her age at election. Please read MOS:LEAD for more details on why we usually only footnote things in the lead if they are likely to be challenged, and on the points I've made about the lead above. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]