Talk:Olivia Nuzzi
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]I'm sorry if this is just me, but the subject of the article doesn't come off as too notable as written. What we have is a very brief listing of career details with no further information on the significance of the individual. If possible, can a clean-up be organized, and if not, can a more well-versed editor look into this and decide if the the significance of the individual better explained? And if not, can somebody look into the notability of the individual and decide if the individual is noteworthy enough for an article? 222.164.218.4 (talk) 17:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Even before recent notoriety in the political news cycle, her notability was established, given her credits, outlets and citations/rankings by media and business publications. Even before your entry in 2/17. Dano67 (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- "her notability was established, given her credits..."
- What credits?! What citations?! What rankings?! I have not seen a single notable article of hers. (Actually, I've only been able to find one article of hers, a brief, personal essay from when her father died.) People refer to her articles, but they don't even name, much less discuss them.2603:7000:B23D:C116:D8E0:2038:E451:4A6 (talk) 06:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Innappropriate editing
[edit]Two editors and an IP have been deleting RS-supported material, claiming that they know better and that the refs contain "inaccuracies". That is not proper editing. They are also inserting material that they should not insert, such as what they "know" to be true, though they are simply another Wikipedia editor. That is not proper. They are also leaving false edit summaries, such as here, where they make a deletion but claim in the edit summary that they are fixing a typo. Those sorts of falsehoods and efforts to deceive are not acceptable. Finally, they make baseless non-RS-supported assertions such as what the subject is primarily known for, or delete material such as the subject's boss's assertion of failings of Nuzzi, or add extraneous material out of nowhere with no connection to the subject such as "that David Carr, the late New York Times media columnist, once praised for its ability to thrive while shunning the internet." That is all inappropriate. --2604:2000:E016:A700:5540:97E0:687C:E1DB (talk) 09:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- "Its ability to thrive..."? 2604:2000:1580:425C:1920:48F:A553:49A1 (talk) 01:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Article in Personal Life Noting Being No Longer Engaged
[edit]The linked article does not provide any information about this. Should this be removed? Nicolasqueen (talk) 17:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- To be clearer, the article says "Nuzzi was engaged to POLITICO chief Washington correspondent and Playbook co-author Ryan Lizza."
- But nothing one way or the other is really reported about it ending. Nicolasqueen (talk) 17:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Pronunciation
[edit]what is Nuzzi's own pronunciation of her surname? I have search using filmot.com and heard every possible combination of sounds, but never her saying it herself. Juwan (talk) 17:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've added a tentative pronunciation from how other people say it in her presence, however if possible, include a citation with her pronunciation! Juwan (talk) 18:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Re: Lead too short
[edit]I've removed the lead too short tag. The lead appears to be just right based on the current version. Viriditas (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Vandalism
[edit]Someone anonymous just changed her profession from journalist to gossip columnist so I reverted it. George Bounacos (talk) 02:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)