Talk:Oligohydramnios

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Oligohydramnios.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2021 and 20 November 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aziz.hadia. Peer reviewers: Hollireynolds7.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oligohydramnios. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130218201856/http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/ip/IP338overview.pdf to http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/ip/IP338overview.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TCOM Medical Student Editing Oligohydramnios

Article Evaluation
Question	Comment
Initial analysis of the article's content?	This is a start-class article that provides room for expansion of content. Wikipedia has a banner on the page that state the content and references require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standard. There is a starting outline that is missing key subsections. The tone is neutral. There are some existing references that could be updated and added to.
How will you improve the article?	Add content to the lead section Add subsections for diagnosis and management Add images Update the references

Aziz.hadia (talk) 02:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

General info

Whose work are you reviewing? Aziz.hadia/Oligohydramnios

Peer Review

Lead:

I think the lead of this article is beautiful
Great flow and hit all the main points

Content:

Content is also impressive but I do feel you could add more links to some of the more difficult terms. To a person in the medical field, it perfectly understandable, but it may be more difficult for the average user to follow. I believe links to terms will help with this.

Tone and balance:

Tone is appropriate and unbiased

Sources and references:

I noticed there are a couple of sources from UpToDate. I wanted to use this source as well but was worried that not everyone would have access to it. Also, when I tried to add a source from UpToDate it would not let me. This may be something we should talk with Dr. Ewing about. UpToDate as the most reliable data on epidemiology for my paper so I am definitely an advocate for using it.

Organization:

I thought the article had good flow and was easy to follow. I really liked your use of subheadings under the headings to split up the information. Definitely made it easy on the eyes.

Images and media:

I know this is an unfinished product so I'm not sure if you were planning to add images, but I do think it would be great if you did! I know it's difficult to add images to Wikipedia but hopefully you can find at least one to show visually representation of Oligohydramnios or at least what amniotic fluid looks like on ultrasound.

Overall impressions:

You clearly put a lot of effort into this article and I think, even unfinished, it is very well done! Great job!

-- Hollireynolds7 (talk) 17:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]