Talk:Oikofobie

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

This article was proposed for deletion.

I understand the book is in Dutch as well as the references and therefore is difficult to judge on its notability. The book is a collection of articles by Baudet and the term Oikofobie has been used for years in the Dutch political debate for that reason. Nowadays Baudet has become a member of the Dutch Parlement and to understand the position of this politician this article is necessarry. Or otherwise copy and merge text into the bio of Baudet and create a paragraph about his political opinions. Best, Ijlo papavri77 (talk) 14:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not difficult to judge the notability of this book: there are no sources about the book, so it's not notable. It's that simple. Baudet's political ideas belong in his biography. --Randykitty (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah I understand. There are plenty of book reviews in Dutch in pretty much all notable newspapers. This is one by Baudet himself on the main alt-right website he regularly posts articles himself;

http://politiek.tpo.nl/2013/09/08/oikofobie-de-angst-voor-het-eigene/ I will search for a few now that are written by other journalists. Ijlo papavri77 (talk) 14:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First source De Groene Amsterdammer (left wing political magazine like New Yorker) https://www.groene.nl/artikel/mijn-lieve-tante-anita — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijlo papavri77 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second: Joop, which is the opinion website owned by television broadcast company VARA, http://www.joop.nl/opinies/baudets-oikofobie-is-niet-het-probleem

Third source Vlaams Belang, which is the biggest Belgian political party in the far right spectrum: https://www.vlaamsbelang.org/oikofobie-de-angst-voor-het-eigene/

No 4 Trouw, daily newspaper. https://www.trouw.nl/home/de-linkse-elite-heeft-het-land-weer-verkwanseld~a0b332d1/

No5 Vrij Nederland. Not about this book, but the follow up one with writer Geert Mak as Baudets opponent. https://www.vn.nl/naar-een-progressief-thuisgevoel/

No6 NPO (Nederlandse Publieke Omroep (organization) Dutch main television channel). Kunststof is a weekly broadcast focused on art and culture: https://www.npo.nl/kunststof/12-09-2013/POMS_NTR_389604

No7 Propria Cures, Dutch student magazine. http://www.propriacures.nl/2013/10/ab-is-in-de-ban-van-die-man-oikoorts/

no8 De Dagelijkse Standaard is the NL variant of Breitbart. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Dagelijkse_Standaard Fake news all the time, but a book review as this one can never be fake news. http://www.dagelijksestandaard.nl/2013/09/gaat-het-westen-gebukt-onder-zelfhaat/