Talk:Ohio's 17th congressional district

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) place(s).

William M. Morgan

The William M. Morgan links at the bottom of the page direct to the incorrect William M. Morgan. It does not seem there is a page for the correct Mr. Morgan. What is the policy on these links? Should the brackets be simply removed, removing the link? --DangApricot (talk) 02:17, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ohio's 17th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.wkyc.com/news/elections/results/20081104/race2026.htm
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question on 1984 results

Had a question regarding the vote totals of the 1984 results listed in the table.

Incumbent Lyle Williams is listed as having 105,449, which certainly makes sense, given he's an incumbent, but doesn't match the total vote count in the FEC's document of 1984 Federal Election Results (Page 98 of the following link: https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-content/documents/federalelections84.pdf)

The results listed in the FEC reports are no doubt wrong - the vote totals add up not to 230,661 total, but to 174,147, whereas the numbers listed on this page do add up to the total vote count listed on the FEC document. Traficant's total vote count is the same both on this page and in the document.

I don't doubt the validity of the numbers here, but I'm wondering where Lyle Williams' correct vote total was found. I've personally tried to dig up the numbers myself, but have not had luck yet.

I apologize if this isn't the right forum for this, but found it worth noting. MikeyX58 (talk) 19:11, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]