Talk:Oglaf

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Comics: Webcomics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Webcomics.
	This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

On Google

Why is Oglaf.com banned from Google results? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.3.184.190 (talk) 13:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Historical Reference

The Oglaf webcomic of April 26, 2020 is titled Thomas Wedders, and depicts a fanciful explanation (involving a magical curse) for that historical character's facial disfigurement. JohnBuska (talk) 17:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Originally signed 2605:A000:1315:C416:FDC5:D038:6C1D:6F01

Incorporated Refideas

All of the sources suggested in the refideas template have been incorporated into the article, so I have deleted the template. This doesn't mean that every bit of useful information from those sources is included, but it's my intention now to mine all the sources in the article for info. HenryCrun15 (talk) 00:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessing as C-class

I am reranking this a C-class. (I've been the most active editor recently, but I've gotten no responses to previous requests for assessment at WikiProject Comics.) C is defined as "The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup." I think that's fair. It gives a clear overview of the style and tone of the comic, with plenty of sources, but lacks an image, detailed analysis, and is perhaps too detailed in its section on reviewer comments. HenryCrun15 (talk) 00:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]