Talk:Odic force
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Odic force article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Popular culture
[edit]The "Popular culture" section should be removed because it is entirely unsourced original research. I am going to remove it. If anyone objects please talk here, thanks. HealthyGirl (talk) 13:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
"The study of Odic force is called odology" -- FALSE?
[edit]The Phrontistery site offered as a citation is not a good source, containing many joke words or fake words that exist in word lists but are not used in reality. The actual meaning of "odology" or "hodology" is the study of paths (among other things); see Wiktionary here: [1], or any mainstream printed dictionary. 2A00:23C5:FE18:2700:2DF9:8B82:AB72:5F13 (talk) 23:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Spirituality articles
- Low-importance Spirituality articles
- C-Class Alternative medicine articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- C-Class New religious movements articles
- Mid-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles