Talk:Ocular hypertension
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Ocular hypertension.
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Ocular hypertension. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051125121629/http://www.aao.org:80/aao/patients/eyemd/upload/Ocular-Hypertension-Glaucoma-and-Eye-Drops.pdf to http://www.aao.org/aao/patients/eyemd/upload/Ocular-Hypertension-Glaucoma-and-Eye-Drops.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:38, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Dec 2024 UCSF SOM MS1 Mini Inquiry Course
[edit]
This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 December 2024 and 20 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Med fa24 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Med fa24 (talk) 06:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Work in Progress Timeline
[edit]| Milepost Date | By the time I go to bed on this date I will have… |
| Tues 12/10
Course day 1 |
· Reviewed Wikiproject Medicine’s website.
· Begun working on all 9 required Wiki Ed training modules. · Begun thinking about the article I want to pursue this month. |
| Thurs 12/12
WP-WIP #1 |
· Finished all 9 required modules.
· Narrowed down the article I want to work on. · Posted my Workplan for everyone to see. · Begun making edits to my article in the “Pathophysiology and Diagnosis” sections and informally presented the progress to the class. |
| Mon 12/16
WP-WIP #2 |
· Made edits to the “Treatment” section of the article and viewed edits made by other Wikipedians who are contributing to the article.
· Informally presented my work-in-progress to the class and received their feedback on my thought process. |
| Tues 12/17
WP-WIP #3 |
· Made edits to the “Introduction” and “Research” sections of the article and viewed edits made by other Wikipedians who are contributing to the article.
· Informally presented my work-in-progress to the class and received their feedback on my thought process. · Submitted peer-reviews to a classmate’s article on the Talk page of the article I review. |
| Wed 12/18
WP-WIP #4 |
· Made edits to all sections of the article that seem adequate.
· Informally presented my work-in-progress to the class and received their feedback on my thought process. · Engaged in any arising conversations with other Wikipedians about the article. |
| Fri 12/20
Showcase Session |
· Completed the Showcase session. |
Med fa24 (talk) 13:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Peer Review:
- Introduction: Just some suggestions if you have time to work on this section! I think that moving the third paragraph about how ocular hypertension is a risk factor for glaucoma to the first paragraph might flow a little better and highlight the importance of ocular hypertension.
- Pathophysiology: Nice job of expanding on this section. I think that a diagram of the chambers of the eye that highlights where aqueous humor is located might help people visualize this a bit more. Also, I think moving the sentence "fluid enters the eye through..." before the "fluid should enter and exit..." might help with the flow. Overall, a digestible explanation.
- Diagnosis: I appreciate that you added an explanation about what ocular tonometry is. I think that you could explain a bit more about what the glaucomatous changes are. If you get a chance, I think that adding more about what things people should look for if using other tools for diagnosis might be helpful. Diagnosis sections are difficult for topics like ocular hypertension, so I think you did a good job.
- Treatment: Like this section. I think that the additions on how much a drug lowers intraocular pressure is important, but I think I'm still a bit confused on what that entails. This section has good information, but I think that running the section through Grammarly or Hemingway Editor might help with improving the flow of the section. You referred to high risk and low risk ocular hypertension in this section, and maybe that's something that would be worth explaining in the pathophysiology or diagnostic section? I think this is a complicated section and you did a good job of distilling the information.
- Research: I like that you specified location and times of the trials and also added more recent studies. Great job! Penguinpages3 (talk) 05:20, 18 December 2024 (UTC)