This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
A fact from Octagon Chapel, Liverpool appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 July 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the nonconformist liturgy of the Octagon Chapel(pictured) in Liverpool, UK, was criticized by Job Orton: "Grieved I am ... to see such an almost deistical composition"?
The illustration of the chapel is not a "pen and ink sketch". It is reproduced from an 1890s publication, which indicates that it is some sort of engraving. The description is wrong on the Commons page, which is currently locked.
Moreover, even if it was a drawing in pen and ink, it ought not be described as a "sketch". I have read that word inappropriately used on Wikipedia to describe everything from the finest and most detailed studies to carefully measured and ruled diagrams. The word "sketch" is onomatopoeic: in other words, if the picture took about 20 seconds to do, and the drawing implement went "scritch-scratch" as it was dome, then, and only then, is the drawing a sketch.
This picture is rather amateurish, but much too careful to be described as a "sketch". Why can't people just use the word "drawing"?
