Talk:Ockbrook and Borrowash
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Ockbrook and Borrowash is a Civil Parish not a Location
[edit]The following conversation was retrieved from User_talk:BL_Lacertae#Ockbrook_and_Borrowash for the benefit of future editors of this page. A R Driver 17:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello BL,
When I created the article, I at first used the Derbyshire Location stub but then changed it. The reason is that each of the villages (Ockbrook and Borrowash) is a location and deserves its own article. As a pair, they are not a location but a civil parish and (a somewhat mismatched) administrative area.
This being so, the Derbyshire Locations stub doesn't seem quite right.
What do you think?
- If theyre both in derbyshire then they should get the derbyshire-geo-stub - thats the way geo-stubs work. the england-geo-stub is for places that are in several counties like Ancestral Thames and the UK-geo-stub is for ones dealing with the whole UK. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 23:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Retrieved from "http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Arbus_Driver"
Hmm. I was thinking more along the lines of there being a need for a derbyshire-admin-stub, or similar. But that's probably a bad idea. In fact, come to think about it, the article may not be a stub at all as there's probably little else to say about it... But let's leave it as you've set it for now. A R Driver 01:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- right - sorry i misunderstood you. no there are no local government stubs by region - there are already so many different stub types that WP:WSS tries to discourage unneccessary splits and since local government regions are, well, regions, geo-stub makes some sort of sense for them. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 22:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Retrieved from "http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Arbus_Driver"
We seem to have reached agreement to do nothing further here (although I think we both realise the situation isn't perfect - it's a slightly odd ball case). So, to ensure that any future editor gets a heads up, I'm going to copy this conversation to Talk:Ockbrook_and_Borrowash. A R Driver 17:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)