Talk:Occupy Boston

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

OWS (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject OWS, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.OWSWikipedia:WikiProject OWSTemplate:WikiProject OWSOWS articles

United States: Massachusetts / Boston Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as Mid-importance).

The Boston Occupier was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 August 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Occupy Boston. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Redirect discussion occurring for this article

There's a discussion occurring regarding a proposal to redirect this article to the Occupy Wall Street article, occurring here: at the administrator's noticeboard. Please feel free to comment regarding this matter there. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:48, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above was closed on 21 October 2011 (UTC). Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Threats against police

The Boston Globe reports that "Boston police are investigating threats against department personnel that may be linked to the Occupy Boston movement". Kelly ^hi! 02:02, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

potential resource Occupy Boston’s laptops and cellphones are powered by bicycle generators, and Occupy DC has installed solar panels

Capitalism vs. the Climate; What the right gets - and the left doesn't - about the revolutionary power of climate change. by Naomi Klein November 9, 2011. This article appeared in the November 28, 2011 edition of The Nation (pages 11-21 in print).

141.218.36.152 (talk) 21:38, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of line.

I removed the final line stating that police were reportedly on stand-by with "water cannons" and the like. Having been present in Dewey Square at 2200 this evening, I saw no water cannons. Police in riot gear were present, which does include tear gas grenade launchers, pepper spray canisters, and other such common instruments. Quendishir (talk)

no longer ongoing?

It may have been evicted but that doesn't mean it isn't ongoing. --76.118.66.64 (talk) 14:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just like Kony 2012, ppl just started not giving a fuck.

Rtnews template

I've removed the Russia Today news template from the page, as it had raised concern because it pointed to a single trending news page, rather than a selection of trend pages, and after discussion in the appropriate places, it's easier to remove it than it is to add lots of other trend pages, as I don't know of any (don't have time to look). If there are any comments, concerns, or suggestions please reply on my talkpage, as I don't watch this page. Penyulap ☏ 03:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]