Talk:Occupiers' Liability Act 1957

Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 23, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 6, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 covers not only land, but also aircraft and ships?

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Occupiers' Liability Act 1957/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ceranthor 14:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

Looks good overall. A couple errors.

This is another extension of a common law principle; in Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44, a seven year old child after eating poisonous berries from a bush in a park - he died, I'd assume?
The berries, which looked like cherries or blackcurrants, were found by the House of Lords to constitute an "allurement" to the child, who found Glasgow Corporation, which owned the park, liable. - probably better with a citation after this
Both done. Ironholds (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

One "infobox" type image checks out.

~~More later. ceranthor 14:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

Much apology for the belated review. I finished reading this the other day, found no more problems, and didn't have time to finish this. It's a sure pass, for a well-written [if boring:] article. ceranthor 00:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]