Talk:Obsello Absenta/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Seems rather short and unfinished at first sight.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   This article is not ready for GA and needs a lot of work.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Only 3 references

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Not ref'd enough

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Again, this is close to a stub.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Needs a lot of work before it is ready to be a GA.