Talk:Object request broker

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Object request broker article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Woefully deficient

This article seems pretty much like a stub. ORB is a huge technology and widely deployed within enterprise systems. It seems like a lot more can be said. Object life-cycle management, data persistence management, session management, security, transaction management, performance issues, cross-platform integration, etc. Any objections to adding an 'expert needed' tag? Ronnotel 04:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but Wikipedia policy is that articles must show evidence via citations to independent sources that their subjects are notable. My guess is that someone thought this term in general would catch on to describe more than the Common Object Request Broker Architecture, but do not think it did. When people say "ORB" they probably mean the CORBA ORB, so suggest just a redirect until other ones besides the "Common" one are available in citations. W Nowicki (talk) 22:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vendor comparison

Can there be a table of what CORBA version, what language bindings (and versions there in) a vendors implementation supports? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.198.232 (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]