Talk:Obinna Oleka/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kaleeb18 (talk · contribs) 00:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be looking over this article using the table below. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 00:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as it has been a while and nothing has changed I will have to fail this ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 23:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	choosing them over from schools like – instead of like put such as
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The lead could be a bit bigger talking more about his career Despite being 6’8, he played at center – Would suggest changing this as despite is a word to watch
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	What makes Capitol Hoops, jucorecruiting.com, cronkitesports.com, basquetplus.com, laverdadonline.com, Sportando, lineadirectaportal.com, interperformances.com, and Afrobasket.com. reliable sources
	2c. it contains no original research.	However, the Sun Devils lost by a score of 80–57 to Oregon, again in the quarterfinals, in what was Oleka's final college game. His 327 rebounds that year were the third-best mark in school history at the time. – These sentences need to have a source Ref 3, 30, and 38 are dead links Spotchecks for refs 1, 10, 19, 20, and 39 are good. ref 41 does not specify the game was on March 27
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	The copyvio detector detects a 40.1% of copyvio possibility, but that is a case of them copying Wikipedia
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.