Talk:Obie Fernandez
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Philosophus (talk · contribs) on 28 April 2009 with the comment: Borderline G11/A7 CSD. This was created by an account that has only edited articles on the article subject and Spot.us. Given the subject of this article built Spot.us, it is incredibly likely that the author is the article's subject. While there is assertion of importance (making A7 questionable), there is little evidence of real impact and no independent sources, thus causing this to fail WP:V and WP:N criteria. It was contested by 118.208.63.14 (talk · contribs) on 2009-04-28 |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
71.227.172.219 (talk) 07:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]I'd like to second a deletion of the page. There's a million authors of a million random technical books. They are not notable. Neither is this one.
- The venue to make an argument for deletion is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obie Fernandez. You may want to read up on what constitutes notability in Wikipedia before you do, though. MLauba (talk) 09:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)