This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
I think this page should be moved to its English name (Arles Obelisk) per WP:TITLE. Articles are supposed to be named in such a way as to be most recognizable by the English-speaking population, so a French title goes against that. More people will recognize "Arles Obelisk" than "Obélisque d'Arles." --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 19:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is not established what is the English name, if any for this site. There's no source, no usage given. This specific site was discussed in 2nd discussion thread at wt:HSITES. If there is Michelin guide or other source discussion of this as Obelisk of Arles or Arles Obelisk or something, then you can make a case, but that is not known, AFAIK. In the other direction, I think the infobox should show the "official" name, Obélisque d'Arles or whatever is the official name, and perhaps secondarily show an English translation.... :) doncram (talk) 20:47, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dudemanfellabra, i appreciate that you developed the historic sites infobox in general and its application to here. A quibble: I think the World Heritage Site treatment is a bit heavy, since this is not itself a WHS. It is only one component of a collection of monuments, apparently including the arena / small Roman coliseum of Arles. I appreciate it links to a parent article, but something more clear that this is itself not a WHS is needed. I don't know WHS terminology for anything like a NRHP "Contributing Property" however. doncram (talk) 20:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]