Talk:ORP Warszawa (disambiguation)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles

Ships

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Polish

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 07:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ORP Warszawa (disambiguation) → ORP Warszawa — - move to generic name, while all articles on peculiar ORP Warszawa ships have specific names Pibwl ←« 18:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support as this is the usual pattern in Category:Set indices on ships and the ORP Warszawa now redirects to a stub. 69.3.72.249 (talk) 19:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support There appear to have been 3 ships of this name, at present the first is treated as the primary meaning, it's not clear why as e.g. the 3rd has the longer article. PatGallacher (talk) 00:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.