This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
This page isn't promotional, I have no affiliation with the firm, nor am I even a civil engineer. They have enough references in the AISC and ACI articles to meet notability requirements. Also they're one of the largest civil engineering firms in Pennsylvania. Scu ba (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mccapra, This article already survived a speedy deletion. Why did you draft it without even consulting the talk page? I am going to submit this for creation unless you provide some valid reason for why this article isn't ready for main space. Scu ba (talk) 22:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hi as I said in the note I left you, it relies much too heavily on the company’s own website. The standard it had to meet us WP:NCORP, so it has to be built on what independent commentators have said about it, not what it says about itself. Mccapra (talk) 22:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
there are 36 sources, only 15 are the company's website. We had a whole speedy deletion talk where it was determined that if an editor felt it didn't reach WP:NCORP to open an RfD, not just mothball the entire article. I am submitting this article for RfC. Scu ba (talk) 22:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This page was moved from main to draft because it wasn't ready, but was resubmitted without any changes. It's pretty close, but it doesn't meet WP:NCORP yet. Large portions of this aren't sourced properly (inline citations don't match). Please improve the article before resubmitting or it will get declined again. Clearfrienda💬03:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This page was moved from main to draft because it wasn't ready, but was resubmitted without any changes. It's pretty close, but it doesn't meet WP:NCORP yet. Large portions of this aren't sourced properly (inline citations don't match). Please improve the article before resubmitting or it will get declined again. Clearfrienda 💬 03:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)