Talk:Null session
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I certainly think it is an important, notable topic in real life Microsoft dominated IT world security. I just found this, let's see iuf it answers my questions.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.36.71.28 (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
I completely agree with the above. This should be expanded by the knowledgeable however.--24.76.90.75 (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Possible quality source
[edit]The article shortly contained quite an amount of good text, which was plagiarized from this book. It was all removed (good), but the book might serve as source for self-generated content to start. --Methossant (talk) 17:28, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]@Kvng: thanks for entering the contest...though the article is so short its hard to see how what is now the lead is a concise summary of the rest of the article. Can this be expanded at all? Similarly Ring protection is good but would be better if expanded a little and had some inline references. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:06, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class Computer networking articles
- Low-importance Computer networking articles
- Stub-Class Computer networking articles of Low-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- Stub-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Low-importance
- All Software articles
- Stub-Class Computer Security articles
- Low-importance Computer Security articles
- Stub-Class Computer Security articles of Low-importance
- All Computer Security articles
- All Computing articles