Jump to content

Talk:Now in Color/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Plot section is less than 400 words so it passes MOS:TVPLOT.
  • Remove the hyphen between "time-frame" (more common in American English).
  • "child birth" should be written as one word for consistency on Wikipedia.
  • "30 metres" → "30 meters" (American English)
  • "did research on" → "researched" (less wordy)
  • "slow motion footage" → "slow-motion footage"
  • "footage of Bettany from set" – rephrase for clarity
  • "Megan McDonnell[10] and pays homage to the 1970s." → "Megan McDonnell and pays homage to the 1970s.[10]" – both of these statements are supported by the source.
  • MOS:TVRELEASE: It may be beneficial to forgo the inclusion of this section if the only information available results in a single sentence such as "[Series] aired on [Network] from [Date 1] to [Date 2].", as this information can be noted in a preceding section.
  • Mark references from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".
  • Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:46, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • All done except the release section bit as I want to get some other opinions on it. Any thoughts @Favre1fan93 and Facu-el Millo? My preference is to have the release section for consistency with the other MCU film and TV articles, but if we aren't going to have it then we need to come up with the best alternative that will apply to quite a few pages. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I think it's reasonable to remove a section that's less than one line long, but isn't there anything else of value to add to the Release section? If not, in which other section would this info be included? —El Millo (talk) 03:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it could fit quite well as the first sentence in #Audience_viewership. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 11:35, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think the section should stay for consistency across MCU-related articles, but if we feel it should be merged, let's put it at the end of "Development". - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm leaning towards Development as well. @Favre1fan93: whatever we do here I think we need to be consistent across the Disney+ episode articles, do you think we need to have this discussion somewhere else before we go mass changing them? I think MOS:TVRELEASE is a good enough reason to change, but since it is just a guideline and we do try to take consistency into account we should get consensus to make the change. One thing to consider is the episodes that have more than one sentence in Release, which is the first two with the title stuff and the ones with Disney+ outage info. The former could also fit in development and the latter can go in Viewership so if we make the change should we also merge those and have no Release sections for any WV episodes? - adamstom97 (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that we have to change those who have more info in the Release section like Filmed Before a Live Studio Audience and Don't Touch That Dial, but if there's a sensible way to do it, it may be better for consistency. —El Millo (talk) 21:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"The section should stay for consistency across MCU-related articles" does not seem like a good reason since it goes against MoS. A change across those articles might be the correct solution. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So far, WandaVision episodes 1 and 2, Breaking the Fourth Wall (WandaVision), The Series Finale, and Journey into Mystery (Loki) are the only Disney+ MCU episodes that have additional release info. So I think the best course of action is to move the release info to the end of development, and if there is additional info as with these five episodes, a "Release" section can be created. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, sure, let's go with that. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Some Dude From North Carolina: This is now done. Thanks for making those updates Favre. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Now_in_Color/GA1&oldid=1042337068"