Talk:Novelty and non-obviousness in Canadian patent law
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]- I've made some significant edits to the page, hoping it is enough to make it 'encyclopedic'. Would like a second opinion though...
Cdlangan (talk) 01:38, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Sentence to be improved, IMHO...
[edit]This sentence:
- "[the grace period of Paragraph 28.2(1)(a)] serves the practical purposes of allowing an inventor to obtain patents within multiple jurisdictions without having to disclose their invention in each jurisdiction simultaneously."
does not really convince me. The priority right seems to serve that purpose, in my opinion. --Edcolins (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit]This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Toronto supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- C-Class Canadian law articles
- Low-importance Canadian law articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2011 Q3