Talk:Nouse
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Just a point I'd like to ask: where does the idea that nouse is more 'upmarket' than Vision come from? Though it is only my opinion I'd say that nouse comes across as the less 'up-market' of the two in terms of appearance, quality of the content and general reliability/accurracy/breaking news. I'd aslo go so far to say from my experience this is shared by many studnets too. Evil Eye 23:27, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
Prod removal
[edit]I removed the prod tag because Nouse is reasonably high up in notability for student papers, evidenced by its comparatively high search engine rankings (I often get Nouse hits when I'm Googling for Wiki sources). Ford MF (talk) 01:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Nouse/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
|
Last edited at 15:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 01:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)