Talk:Not Guilty (1910 film)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DepressedPer (talk · contribs) 00:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Time for another silent short film article review.
Here's what I found in this article:
- Lead
- No problems found in this section.
- Plot
- "The film begins Harry Martin saying goodbye to his blind mother before leaving the house." begins 'with'.
- "Harryand the thief encounter each other..." Space between Harry and 'and'.
- "Kate states that it is seems impossible to prove his innocence." → "Kate states that it is impossible to prove his innocence."
- Production
- "The film shows novel techniques in film production that were used to assist in viewer in understanding the narrative." "assist 'the' viewer."
- "cites this as an attempt improve the narrative..." "'to' improve the narrative."
- Release and reception
- Structured well and the sources are put in their appropriate places.
- References
- Link some of the publishers in the sources if possible.
I'll put this on hold so you can tend to the issues I explained. DepressedPer (talk) 01:13, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- @DepressedPer: I made all the fixes. This is not a film I have seen, but I decided to go through and properly address a few additional details not uncovered back in Bowers encyclopedia. You would not believe how much of a pain it is to search archive for "not guilty" when the words "film" and "movie" do not have use. Thankfully, it exists so future reviews are possible by those lucky enough to get it from the archive. It is a fragile film and hopefully preserved - those reels still deteriorate over time otherwise. Thanks for the review. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- It is now a GA. DepressedPer (talk) 08:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- @DepressedPer: I made all the fixes. This is not a film I have seen, but I decided to go through and properly address a few additional details not uncovered back in Bowers encyclopedia. You would not believe how much of a pain it is to search archive for "not guilty" when the words "film" and "movie" do not have use. Thankfully, it exists so future reviews are possible by those lucky enough to get it from the archive. It is a fragile film and hopefully preserved - those reels still deteriorate over time otherwise. Thanks for the review. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.