Talk:Norton 360
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nominating for GA
[edit]--Tyw7 (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 06:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: Moved GA to the top of the talk page. decltype (talk) 10:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Expand article
[edit]Found some possibly relavent links to expand the "Reception" section of the article. Several editors mentioned the addition of a dedicated reception and criticism section would help the article.
- blogs.computerworld.com/new_york_times_blooper_throw_away_your_anti_virus_software
- gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/12/five-controversial-ways-to-speed-your-pc/?em
Tyw7, if you find any links, how 'bout we post them here so everyone can view them. TechOutsider (talk) 21:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Another link
This is more reliable and less controversial than the articles used above. Definitely need to use it for the article. TechOutsider (talk) 21:49, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Windows 7
Need some more information about Windows 7 compatibility.
- symantec.com/norton/theme.jsp?themeid=windows7
- community.norton.com/norton/board/message?board.id=Win7Beta&thread.id=1705
Please incorporate to article. TechOutsider (talk) 22:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Norton 360 Provate Beta.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Norton 360 Provate Beta.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:49, 10 September 2011 (UTC) |
File:Norton 360- Version 5.0.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Norton 360- Version 5.0.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 18 November 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:58, 18 November 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Norton 360. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/65k9QUanf?url=http://community.norton.com/t5/Norton-360/Safe-Search-update/m-p/77870 to http://community.norton.com/norton/board/message?board.id=Norton_360&thread.id=10218
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720024630/http://utopia.csis.pace.edu/dps/2007/jkile/2005%20-%20Spring/DCS823/Spyware/01016895.pdf to http://utopia.csis.pace.edu/dps/2007/jkile/2005%20-%20Spring/DCS823/Spyware/01016895.pdf
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120910214651/http://www.gcn.com/online/vol1_no1/17572-1.html to http://www.gcn.com/online/vol1_no1/17572-1.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720091820/http://rfrost.people.si.umich.edu/courses/SI110/readings/Privacy/Magic_Lantern.pdf to http://www.si.umich.edu/~rfrost/courses/SI110/readings/Privacy/Magic_Lantern.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227101051/http://windowssecrets.com/2008/02/07/01-Symantec-uninstaller-may-not-finish-the-job to http://windowssecrets.com/2008/02/07/01-Symantec-uninstaller-may-not-finish-the-job
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223150611/http://service1.symantec.com/Support/tsgeninfo.nsf/docid/2005033108162039 to http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/tsgeninfo.nsf/docid/2005033108162039
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090325215843/http://solutions.symantec.com/sdccommon/asp/symcu_defcontent_view.asp?sprt_cid=b32555cd-1b26-4041-abac-882faf8d365f to http://solutions.symantec.com/sdccommon/asp/symcu_defcontent_view.asp?sprt_cid=b32555cd-1b26-4041-abac-882faf8d365f
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090122232705/http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9088598%2F to http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9088598%2F
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]I propose merging Norton 360 (2006-2014) into Norton 360. The legacy product information can be put into a section. It is understandable that they might be separated, given Norton Internet Security and Norton Security as intermediaries; however, I think a redirect from the current legacy article to a section in the contemporary article could remedy this discomfort. Tule-hog (talk) 07:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class Computer Security articles
- Mid-importance Computer Security articles
- C-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Computer Security articles
- C-Class software articles
- Mid-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Mid-importance
- All Software articles