Talk:North Star (Star Trek: Enterprise)

North Star (Star Trek: Enterprise) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 11, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 8, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Star Trek: Enterprise episode "North Star" was filmed on the Western sets at Universal Studios, including one used in the 1940 film My Little Chickadee?

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Star Trek Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:North Star (Star Trek: Enterprise)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 01:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing: " they overthrew the aliens and their descendants now treat them as second class citizens."

Modified that, I see what you mean, sounds like the alien descendents treat the humans as second class citizens. Miyagawa (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The lead and plot don't make it clear: The humans were abducted from Earth, right? And they were abducted in 1860 or so?

Made a small change to the lead and plot to specify both of those points. Miyagawa (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The guest actors need a citation.

I didn't add one as each of the actors were included in the second paragraph of the production section. The infobox used to have four or five more, but those were mostly stunt actors and I couldn't find a citation for them to say they were in this episode specifically (so I removed them). Miyagawa (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vague sentence: " executive producer Rick Berman set him the challenge of writing a "parallel Earth" story similar to those featured in TOS but would fit with Enterprise." -- First, what is a "parallel Earth" story, what kinds of this story appeared in TOS and how would they "fit" differently in this series versus that one?
" Gene Roddenberry's original pitch to NBC for Star Trek was a "wagon train to the stars"." -- Was the western theme a homage to this detail? I'm having a hard time figuring out why this detail is where it is.

I'll cover the above two points together - I'll dig up the original Star Trek pitch by Roddenberry to NBC which explains this along with the "parallel Earth" thing - Roddenberry had an idea at the time which was expressed in some detail in the original pitch which involved humans from other eras living on other planets. I can't even remember if he even explained a mechanic in order to facilitate this. But for example, with The Original Series, you had the episode where there was a planet full of Romans, then one with Nazis, and Cowboys etc. Wasn't really done after that series, and to be honest, Stargate SG1 took the idea and ran off with it completely. Miyagawa (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, removed the wagon train reference and added a new one to explain the parallel Earth point from the original pitch. Miyagawa (talk) 19:00, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate links tool shows six links which need fixing.

Once I've added the bit to explain the parallel Earth query above I'll run the checker again and fix this. Otherwise, I'm bound to only add more. Miyagawa (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links tool checks out. There are no disambiguation links.
I see no problems with article stability and neutrality. All images appear to be suitably licensed.

Placing the article on hold to wait for improvements. —Ed!^(talk) 01:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! Passing the article for GA. —Ed!^(talk) 11:35, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on North Star (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on North Star (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Trekweb article about the Ratings for this article is dead, permanently dead. The article was titled "Final Ratings: Household Remains Steady But Audience Gains Elusive for "North Star"" and existed at the URL http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=3f620cc5f2335 and also at http://trekweb.com/articles/2003/11/14/3fb4ff0ca7b59.shtml neither of which happened to be archived in the Wayback machine.

Archive.today appears to have a copy of the page http://archive.today/2013.04.12-003819/http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=3fb4ff0ca7b59 but in fact they have only captured a dead page with no text. -- 109.79.169.104 (talk) 02:41, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Ain't It Cool News said he enjoyed North star and called it an "intriguing cowboys-and-aliens extravaganza".[1] That was in his review for "Similitude" but as far as I can tell there was no separate standalone review for 3.9. There were reviews for episodes 3.8, 3.10 no Enterprise reviews until 2.23. That the show wasn't being written about regularly even in a publication as nerdy as AICN also tells you something. -- 109.76.133.190 (talk) 16:15, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Found a free audio commentary for this episode, originally from the official Star Trek website[2] but TrekCore saved it from the memory hole and in 2014 made a copy of the podcast available for download in MP3 format.[3][4] The commentary podcast featured writer David A. Goodman with editor of StarTrek.com Tim Gaskill. (A similar commentary from Goodman and writer Chris Black was included with the season 3 Bluray release.) -- 109.76.132.93 (talk) 01:37, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]