Talk:North Philadelphia station

North Philadelphia station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 12, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from North Philadelphia station appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 July 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Châteauesque design of the North Philadelphia station (pictured) ushered in the use of Beaux-Arts architecture in railway stations in the United States?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/North Philadelphia station.

Wikipedia

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 49, 2016

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Old Talk Page

Discussions about North Philadelphia (SEPTA station) prior to June 10th, 2009

Done, after much struggling. But I still think the old Talk:North Philadelphia (SEPTA station) should've had it's status changed to dab, and not redirected here. ----DanTD (talk) 20:31, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Time to agree on a name

This article has been renamed quite a few times in the past few weeks. I don't think the current name it suitable because it's not uniform with the naming of other SEPTA stations. Discuss and come up with a reasonable name. I vote for North Philadelphia (SEPTA station).

That's better as a dab page, where it currently stands and belongs. ----DanTD (talk) 20:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And evidently some editors didn't take a hint about misusing dab pages as articles. ----------User:DanTD (talk) 02:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Moves at this article seem to have caused some confusion with the talk pages recently. The earliest history suggests the article was originally called North Philadelphia station in 2006. It moved several times over the years, especially once the article now at North Philadelphia station (SEPTA Broad Street Line) was created; a dab page was also created. Following the WP:USSTATION guideline, I moved the article to North Philadelphia station on January 12, 2016. This seemed logical per USSTATION and WP:TWODABS; there are only two articles called "North Philadelphia station" and this one consistently gets the vast majority of the page views. A few weeks ago, Dreams out loud moved the article to North Philadelphia station (Amtrak and SEPTA Regional Rail).[1] Following the lengthy discussion among several editors about SEPTA stations on my talk page here, I returned it to North Philadelphia station. There were no other objections, the page continued to receive 90% of the page views,[2] and it allows us to avoid the unweildy and unintuitive disambiguation. During these various moves the talk pages got mis-sorted; that's largely on me, but I believe they are sorted out now.
My sense is that this is the best arrangement - the majority of readers looking for this station will find it easily, and those looking for North Philadelphia station (SEPTA Broad Street Line) can find it through the hat note is just as few clicks as when there was a two-entry dab page. If others have other suggestions, we can discuss it.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's something wrong when you base a name on the number of views it gets on Wikipedia. The name change from the generic "North Philadelphia Station" was based on the types of service associated with it. I supposed you'd name the Broad Street Line station "North Philadelphia station" if that was the one that got the most hits instead, and that's not good either. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 01:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Except that's literally what a major site guideline says. By all three of the tests suggested there, this is the primary topic for the name. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is a well-established part of the disambiguation guidelines, and has been for many years. This article is primary by all measures. And yes, if evidence showed another article was primary, then a different arrangement would be necessary, but it's not the case here.--Cúchullain ^t/c 02:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Destructive edits re number of trains per day

An anonymous IP address editor reverted an edit which cited a mere two trains a day. This fact is borne out in train schedules of this week, prior to the construction, and September. The editor improperly cites the construction period as unrepresentative. Actually the construction period this summer has no fewer trips than usual. This week (prior to the July 10 changes) shows the same schedule I cited: only two trains a day in each direction. The same is shown from the Amtrak website for September, after the construction. Please do research before making an edit. Plus, if you are going to do destructive edits, please have the courtesy of making an account.Dogru144 (talk) 04:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minor nit, but the linked schedule shows 5 trains total stopping at the station. 649 and 193 southbound and 110, 170, and 640 northbound. Overturn 91 (talk) 18:22, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I said in particular directions. Of course, adding the two directions doubles the number. Nonetheless, in contrast to the dozens a day that pass through, and the historic importance of the station as the primary PRR station for trains heading to Harrisburg and beyond, this is a low number.Dogru144 (talk) 20:00, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Train frequency is already discussed in the Layout and service section - there is already a cited statement that the station is served by an average of five daily trains - and any further discussion of train frequency should build on that. Right now, PHN is served by three northbounds and 2 southbounds, as Overturn 91 stated. This will be reduced during the summer as train 110 is cancelled. All indications are that service will go back to normal after the summer, including the resumption of train 110. The reason you only see two northbounds in September is because train 170 is usually not available for online booking (I believe it's the result of some arcane rule), not because it won't operate. The Amtrak ticketing site is not a reliable source for that exact reason - it's a black box that does not always correspond 1:1 with what service is actually offered. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]