Talk:North Carolina Superintendent of Public Instruction

Possible merge

Would it not make sense to merge this article with the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction?

User:G._Moore talk 20:59, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Potential source

NC Insight 1990 -Indy beetle (talk) 12:08, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Questions of governance

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]
• [4]

-Indy beetle (talk) 09:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:North Carolina Superintendent of Public Instruction/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: NSNW (talk · contribs) 04:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Will start the review in a few days; will also do the three other reviews concerning the North Carolina government. NSNW (talk) 04:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Prose:

Very little issues here:

History of the office

• "In 1868 the state ratified a new constitution which provided for a system of public schools to be led by a Superintendent of Public Instruction and a State Board of Education"; pronoun misusage, 'which provided' should be 'that provided'.
• "but the bill was quashed in a House of Representatives' committee."; the noun form is incorrect, remove the apostrophe.

Duties and structure

• "They are seventh in line of succession to the governor."; should be 'in the line of succession'.

That's everything. NSNW (talk) 01:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

• @NSNW: All should be good now per my edit. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

  Passing. NSNW (talk) 13:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)