Talk:North American XB-21
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the North American XB-21 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
North American XB-21 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 30, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the North American XB-21 (pictured) outperformed its competitor for a U.S. Army Air Corps bomber contract, but lost on price? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:North American XB-21/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 19:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am reviewing this article and find it brief but to the point. It fulfills the GA criteria. Xtzou (Talk) 19:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality: Clearly and concisely written
- B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MoS
- A. Prose quality: Clearly and concisely written
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 19:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Awesome. Thanks! - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 19:28, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on North American XB-21. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081121215312/http://www.aiaa-myaerospace.org/rhtp/stories/rusinek_tale.pdf to http://www.aiaa-myaerospace.org/rhtp/stories/rusinek_tale.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114004727/http://www.aero-web.org/specs/northam/xb-21.htm to http://www.aero-web.org/specs/northam/xb-21.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- GA-Class aviation articles
- GA-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles