Talk:Norman J. Wildberger

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to rational trigonometry.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This redirect is supported by the science and academia work group.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Norman J. Wildberger is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

I'm concerned with the sentence

Contemporary (November, 2006) consensus (see Review by Professor James Franklin from Jim Reviews) amongst the mathematical community seems to be cautiously favorable.

It's hardly consensus amongst the mathematical community if the one review is comnig from one colleague in his department! Pascal.Tesson 21:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this article is neutral

Yes but there are several reviews included within the article that point toward the same direction. Also note that I wrote "seems to be CAUTIOUSLY favorable" I think you are nitpicking here... Emperor 21:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have now removed the "npov" tag, because this article is as neutral as can be. As for you, Pascal Tesson, I'd appreciate it if you removed yourself from the vandalism of my page. Regards. --Emperor 20:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A change wouldn't hurt

I've removed the talk of "consensus", as there hasn't been a lot of published discussion. I hope the change solves the problem. - James Franklin

But to be perfectly honest it should say "he has received support from one of his colleagues of UNSW." I don't think it's nitpicking to question the neutrality of the observer in this case. Pascal.Tesson 01:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Resurrect this article

This article was nominated for deletion eight years ago: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Norman_J._Wildberger While it was probably right to merge the article at that point in time, since then Wildberger has attracted quite a following due to his Youtube channel. Of course it is hard to define when a person has crossed the threshold into "famous enough" status, but I believe the Professor, mostly due to his own self-promotion, has done just that. ImTheIP (talk) 23:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]