Talk:Norma Paulus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Norma Paulus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Norma Paulus has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 14, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 1, 2019.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Oregon High‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: State Legislatures Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Certificates of Mastery

Shouldn't wait until the Senate passes the same measure and the gov. signs off on it? Aboutmovies 05:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably right, I guess the talk page would have been a better spot for it. I was thinking that since the vote was so overwhelming, it is likely to pass those hurdles, and is noteworthy enough that someone interested in Paulus would be poorly served by not having it mentioned. But you point is well taken…if you revert, I won't be hurt! -Pete 21:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion source

~~This has a small amount of info to add to the SOS time.~~ Aboutmovies (talk) 09:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Norma Paulus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071127235227/http://www.leg.state.or.us/capinfo/foundation/foundation_newsltr_vol6_no2.pdf to http://www.leg.state.or.us/capinfo/foundation/foundation_newsltr_vol6_no2.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.uoregon.edu/~uadvance/awards/entries/791.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://bluebook.state.or.us/misc/intro/ded.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of conflict of interest - but would like to still contribute

To all the folks that have built this page, thanks for helping to fill in gaps in Oregon's political history. Your work is greatly appreciated by many that care about the subject. I have made some edits to this page in the past several years, either without an account, and since January 2017, with the account of lgrayp. As a novice Wikipedian, I unwittingly committed a primary error, in editing a page of someone I'm related to. All edits under those IPs, and user "lgrayp" have been in good faith, and any changes of factual nature or Wikipedia style are appreciated. In the future, to follow the rules of Wikimedia, I will not make direct edits. However, I would like to suggest edits for other to consider. I welcome suggestions of how to interact appropriately. Should I post suggestion for edits in the Talk page? If there is no one else watching this page, I'll look to refer suggestions to others. Thanks again - lgrayp (talk) 19:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC) (talk) 01:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Example of suggested edit: Under Political Career section, 3rd para, link phrase "Eagleton Institute of Politics and Policy" to that related Wikipedia page "Eagleton Institute". Note: That institution's "Center for Women..." was not formed until the 1980s, so the parent organization is the relevant link in context. Thanks for considering lgrayp (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]