Talk:Norfolk Four

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Norfolk Four article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"William Bosko was not considered a suspect in the case."

Why does this line exist in the article? Of course he wasn't "considered a suspect." Neither was General Custer, Ghandi, Peter Pan, or Mother Theresa. Are we going to list everyone on the damn planet who wasn't considered a suspect? Now, if you're wondering why it matters, let me explain it: it's because nearly every single one of these damned "let's defend murderers" articles on Wikipedia includes some kind of douchebaggy attack on the family of the victim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.117.75.183 (talk) 06:23, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Largely Believed"?

Before my recent edit, the article said that the N4 were "largely believed to be innocent". I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean, but it sounds like you're trying to say that their innocence is an accepted fact. Now, I personally find the evidence for their innocence to be overwhelming, but it's obviously not a universal POV. If it were, the N4 would not still be in prison! Reworded to reflect this. Isaac R (talk) 00:41, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updates

Three of the convictions of the Norfolk Four were overturned or vacated, and three men were pardoned in 2009, being released from prison. Wilson had already completed his sentence and was out but required to register as a sex offender. In 2017 all four received full pardons by Gov. McAuliffe and were exonerated, clearing their records; they no longer have to register as sexual offenders. In December 2018 the four received a settlement from the City of Norfolk and the State of VA for their wrongful convictions based on false confessions.Parkwells (talk) 21:36, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]