Talk:Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Can we add cocaine here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.77.207.58 (talk) 03:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NRI, NARI, NERI??

Sometimes the abbreviation NERI is also used instead of NRI. Outside the USA "NARI" is used, since norepinephrine is known there as noradrenaline. The abbreviation SNRI is reserved for serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and should not be used for the NRI/NARI/NERI class.
I am not aquainted with the US-situation. --Wg0867 19:59, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Big pharm propaganda?

The controversy about reboxetine is well-known. In controlled trials, it doesn't beat placebo. You can find some of the controversy in the reboxetine article on Wikipedia. Reboxetine is a well-known noreprinephrine reuptake inhibitor, one of the newest. Yet in this article you won't even find out that the controversy exists 69.108.166.84 (talk) 21:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Halmark Article/Entry

Thinking of changing the word "drug" to molecule. How can we word this article so that it is clear that the word/molecule norepinephrine is NOT confused with non-epinephrine, as any intentionally use of language to confuse is synonymous with ABUSE. How can I change the wording of this molecule's entry so that it doesn't sound like it's part of the behavior wherein known participation in any "unnatural" creation and propagation of such articles get a temporary ban from wikipedia and permanently banned from any government or regulatory authority? It's not just the term "drug" used in this entry for a molecule, and how other terms with both positive and negative connotation are abused as propaganda.Dirtclustit (talk) 22:35, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unpublished trials

Why does this article repeatedly mention unpublished trials? If these trials were never published, they were also never peer reviewed, right? It's strange that they were mentioned at all. Zoon van Zaal (talk) 21:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]