Talk:Nordhordland Bridge/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Well referenced, assume good faith for off-line and Norwegian language sources. Those that I did access supported the cited statements.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Thorough, with unnecessary detail.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Stable
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Suitably licensed and captioned, I love the picture of the bridge in fog.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- An interesting article, I had not realised pontoon bridges of such size had been constructed. I am happy to list as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
-
- Thank you for taking the time to review the article :) Arsenikk (talk) 19:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: