Jump to content

Talk:Nord Stage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNord Stage has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 23, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Nord Stage/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    " of Stockholm, Sweden. " perhaps "in ..."?
     Done Changed to Stockholm in Sweden and wikilinked --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Footnotes should be placed behind commas in "Reception" :)
     Done Have done a few of these MOS fixes recently, and of course the last thing I did before the GA review would not have them. Anyway, fixed. :-) --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall: Aye. Good work! :) Regards.--Kürbis () 17:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail: