Talk:Norah Schuster

A fact from Norah Schuster appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in 1896, Arthur Schuster illustrated his lectures on the newly-discovered X-rays with images of his daughter Norah Schuster (hands pictured) that required a 10-minute exposure?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Norah Schuster.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

England

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

better portrait requested

Her importance to Women in Medicine deserves a better portrait than the group-shot of her at the British Pathological Association of 1928. If someone has something better, please add it to the main article. --2600:6C48:7006:200:D84D:5A80:173:901D (talk) 04:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, however, none has so far been found despite search. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:20, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date of x-ray in Infobox

Even though the date in the Infobox has a citation, if you enlarge the lower left corner, you'll see a date on the x-ray film of "April 13/09". I take this to mean that the x-ray was actually done on either "April 13, 1909" or "April 9, 1913". Given that the x-ray was done in England, either date could be correct but the issue could probably be settled by someone who's familiar with British date notations.

Also, I challenge the "1896" date simply by how well formed and 'mature' the bones are. There are too well formed/mature to be that of a 4 year old child; but not of someone either 17 or 21 years of age.

Can this be looked into and verified/settled? 2600:8800:786:A300:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 06:30, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the year from the article caption. I don't think there is any doubt they are Norah's hands even if the exact year is in doubt. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:26, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]