Talk:Non-blocking linked list

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Note

The significant point is first the atomicity of certain operations (effectively a pseudo-lock) and secondly the algorithmic implementations, and the speed benefit they bring. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 02:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC).

Also of interest Split-Ordered Lists: Lock-Free Extensible Hash Tables by Ori Shalev and Nir Shavit.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 02:59, 29 November 2014 (UTC).

Should we mention DCAS(https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Double_compare-and-swap)

DCAS makes this trivial, but is rarely supported. This might be worth mentioning as a heavy-handed hardware fixDCAS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsaxvc (talk • contribs) 03:40, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]