Talk:Non-Euclidean surface growth
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
A modest request
[edit]Can someone explain this topic in common English so that anyone with a high school education could understand it? It might make perfect sense to someone with a Masters' degree in mathematics, but as it currently stands, this article is a mess of jargon & technical gobblity-gook. -- llywrch (talk) 22:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Useless article
[edit]This article is nonsensical. Disregarding the poor writing, I doubt it would make sense even to people familiar with the material. The author also apparently doesn't know how to properly code citations. Please merge with Non-Euclidean geometry or similar article, or delete entirely. MaribelGame (talk) 17:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- The article makes sense to me and this seems a real topic, but I agree the English was garbled. I tried a quick rewrite to make the prose a little more clear. I wouldn't be opposed to a merge as an application of Non-Euclidean geometry or Riemannian geometry. --
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}16:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)