Talk:Nokia N96

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nokia N96 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Finland Low‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Price

how much it will be??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.231.248.124 (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

550 euro in europe. 217.132.5.175 (talk) 21:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links

i don't understand

Wikipedia is not a collection of links,but there are links to site with advertise

Nokia N96 hi-res images
Nokia N96 Review
Nokia N96 - MobileSift

—Preceding unsigned comment added by BOSSBO01 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are adding links that do not meet linking criteria as per WP:Cite. All links must follow the criteria set forth in that policy. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 16:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OF ! I AM SORRY. I DONT KNOW THAT IF I INSIST TO ADD AN WEB ADRESS TO WIKI AND THIS ADRESS IS DELETED IS CONSIDERED VANDALISM. I DON T UNDERSTAND ALL TEXT FROM WIKI. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BOSSBO01 (talk • contribs) 12:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it was inappropriate to treat it as vandalism rather than a content dispute, but to approach the issue differently: what unique value does your link provide that is not available through the other links? The review links at least provide different perspectives. Dancter (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a Negative?

"Same battery as original N95 (950 mAh), but the N96 reportedly has a much better battery life using the same battery (Nokia N95 8GB has 1200 mAh)"

If the battery life is supposedly "much better", it wouldn't be a negative feature, even if the rated mAH is lower. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.58.41.18 (talk) 21:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand it's better than the N95 but not as good as the N95 8GB. --jefo (talk) 09:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removed '* N95/N95 8G has 2.8/5.6 Lens (N96 has 2.8/5.2)' (lower min apperture = better ??) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.195.143.214 (talk) 14:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Zoom mistake

I edit this page alot, and the Digital Zoom was not true, the N96 Digital Zoom is much better. 217.132.84.102 (talk) 22:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Limited graphics acceleration (only for internal apps)

What is the "Limited graphics acceleration (only for internal apps)" does mean? please answer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.145.23 (talk) 02:08, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic

The entire positive / negative section should be completely rewritten. This is an encyclopedia, not a hardware review site. Lists of pros and cons are subjective. This should be completely rewritten, in prose, in an encyclopedic tone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.21.103.36 (talk) 06:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it does have full support imaging and graphic hardware accleration aswell the cpu can run upto 334 mhz it got better mangement of caches and processing as well —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.57.203 (talk) 01:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this is the specs on the cpu: Nomadik® STn8815 multimedia application processor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.57.203 (talk) 01:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Currently the best camera phone by Nokia?

So is the N96 currently the best camera phone Nokia has? Wolcott (talk) 13:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The N95 8G has 20x Digital Zoom too. And Dual ARM11 is better, what the hell is going here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.38.191 (talk) 20:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Downloadable maps (google maps,Nokia maps,Route 66,etc) N95 8G has Nokia Maps 2.0, and can be downloaded Google Maps and Route 66.
Infrared port was added.
The diffrents betweem the the lens was added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.17.168 (talk) 16:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia N96 overview

THE PAGE IS FULLY EDITED, If you want a full spec. go to ([1]), NOTE: All the information In this page is 100% correct and licensed by nokia forum. Joseph.w.s (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Variants

Could somebody who is technicaly knowledgable add the variants of the N96, i.e., comparison of N96-1, N96-2, N96-3? ... just as done for the N95: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Nokia_N95#Variations I found something like this on the web, but I do not have reliable sources: - N96-1 (RM-247) (RoW, Rest of the World), supports WCDMA 2100/900 bands - N96-2 (RM-297) (China), WCDMA not supported - N96-3 (RM-472) (North America), supports WCDMA 1900/850 bands For example, if somebody wants to buy an N96, it is important to ask for the RM version, otherwise UMTS will not work ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.231.64.64 (talk) 08:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article

Since Wikipedia has an obvious bias against Nokia phones, specifically the Nokia N85 -- sister to N96, the policy is this article should be deleted also. The vote against the N85 was the Wikipedia is not a product catalog/advertisement even for a released product, and so this policy should be evenly applied to the N96, the N97, as well as the HTC Touch Pro, and so on. NuShrike (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to editors

Please remember to add summaries to your edits. It may be a pain to do, but it saves everyone else having to check uncontroversial edits. Thanks --Topperfalkon (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nokia N96. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080923170709/http://www.nokia.co.uk:80/flagship to http://www.nokia.co.uk/flagship

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nokia N96. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080324123709/http://europe.nokia.com/A4797549 to http://europe.nokia.com/A4797549

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]