Talk:No. 78 Squadron RAAF

No. 78 Squadron RAAF has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 23, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 6, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that No. 78 Squadron RAAF took part in the last major air battle between the Royal Australian Air Force and Japanese air units during World War II?

Military history: Aviation / South Pacific / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War II task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:No. 78 Squadron RAAF/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 01:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How can I say no? ;-) Should be able to get to it in the next day or two... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ian Nick-D (talk) 07:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review:

No issues with dup, dab or external links.

Structure, referencing, detail, neutrality and image licensing all okay.

Couple of minor points re. inforbox:

If using a flag for service then I guess we should use one for nationality/allegiance (I prefer not to see them at all myself, but they still seem to be the convention).
- I don't like them much either; removed.
I think we'd generally add "World War II" (unlinked) to the engagements, then indent or bullet point the linked campaigns beneath.
- Good point - done

I copyedited for prose so check you're happy with all that, otherwise I think we're about done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the review and edits Ian Nick-D (talk) 07:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No prob -- passed as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]